Common Questions · Prostate surgery · No. 08
Will HoLEP affect my erections?
On average, no. The trade-off men fear is real, but it is the ejaculation rather than the erection — and confusing the two costs some men an operation that would have suited them.
By Mr Musaab Yassin, Consultant Urological Surgeon & Andrologist. Oxford and central London.
Almost every man who asks me about "sexual side effects" is asking about erections. It is worth separating the question, because the answers are different: erections are usually preserved, ejaculation usually is not, and orgasm sits somewhere in between.
What the evidence shows
Most studies of HoLEP report little or no average decline in erectile function on validated measures such as the IIEF-5 or SHIM.1234 A narrative review synthesising studies through 2025 reached the same conclusion, describing HoLEP as having a stable erectile profile with at most transient early dips.5
The head-to-head comparisons agree. Randomised trials against TURP found no meaningful long-term difference in erectile outcomes,678 and meta-analyses of randomised trials support that while also showing HoLEP causes less bleeding, needs a catheter for less time, and shortens hospital stay.910
So against the operation it is most often compared with, HoLEP is a trade-up in recovery rather than a trade-off in erections.
The nuance the averages hide
An average of zero can conceal two groups moving in opposite directions, and here it does.
A minority of men do report worse erections afterwards — and they are disproportionately the men who had normal erections to begin with.111213 In multicentre and prospective datasets the mean stays flat, but subgroup analysis shows a small, real risk of decline in men starting from a normal baseline. Larger prostates may also raise the risk in some cohorts.
If your erections currently work well, that is worth building into the decision. It does not make HoLEP the wrong operation. It makes the conversation a different one from the man who is already on tablets.
Early is not final
Several studies found early dips in erectile and orgasm-related scores which then recovered by three to twelve months.1415916
The most useful figure comes from a prospective series by an experienced surgeon past the learning curve: erectile function had recovered in 53% of men by one month and 85% by twelve months.17
A poor result at six weeks is not the answer. It is a stage.
Some of what gets called "ED" is not ED
This is the most common misreading I encounter, and it matters.
Part of the apparent erectile signal after HoLEP is actually a change in orgasm or ejaculation, not in penile rigidity.11161318 Men use "sexual dysfunction" as one word. The literature separates erections, orgasm, ejaculation and satisfaction — and after this operation they move differently.
A man whose erections are unchanged but whose orgasm feels muted because there is no antegrade ejaculate will often describe that as "the operation affected me sexually". He is right, but not in the way he thinks, and the distinction changes what can be done about it.
That is covered properly on its own page: what HoLEP does to ejaculation.
How this compares with the alternatives
Against TURP and other enucleation techniques, erectile outcomes are broadly similar, and erectile function is generally stable on average after all of them.19 The main sexual trade-off across this whole family of operations is ejaculation.
Against the minimally invasive procedures — Rezūm, prostatic urethral lift, Aquablation, prostate artery embolisation — the pattern reverses. Those preserve ejaculation better and sometimes short-term sexual scores too, but they generally do not match HoLEP for the completeness of deobstruction, the improvement in flow, or durability.20212223
That is the actual choice: how much tissue comes out, against how much sexual function stays exactly as it is. There is no option that maximises both.
How strong is the evidence?
Strong for the claim that HoLEP does not on average worsen erections — it rests on randomised trials, meta-analyses and multiple prospective cohorts.56910 Moderate for the subgroup risk in men with normal baseline function, which comes from subgroup analyses rather than from trials designed to test it.1213 Moderate for the recovery trajectory, which comes largely from single-centre prospective series.17
Bottom line
If erectile dysfunction is your main worry about prostate surgery, HoLEP is not the procedure that most often causes it. Average erectile function is stable, long-term outcomes match TURP, and early dips usually recover through the first year.
The genuine cost is ejaculation, and men who have normal erections now should hear that their individual risk of erectile change — while small — is not zero.
The conversation worth having is not "will I get ED?" It is "given my current erections, my prostate size, how badly I am sleeping, and how much ejaculation matters to me, which of these operations fits?" That question has a good answer. The first one does not.
Worth reading alongside: the full appraisal of the evidence behind HoLEP, and what happens at a first appointment.
If this sounds like you
A first consultation is £295, and follow-up £190. It usually runs at least twenty minutes; allow up to an hour if you are likely to need a scan, a flow test, or blood or urine tests on the day. You do not need a referral to book privately, and you are under no obligation to proceed with anything.
Send an enquiry · Symptom questionnaire · Compare the treatments, with the evidence
The 24 studies behind this page▾
- Roper C, Slade A, Caras R, Shelton T, Rivera M. Ejaculatory and erectile function outcomes following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. The Prostate. 2024;84:791–6. doi:10.1002/pros.24697
- Alkan I, Pelit ES, Canat HL, Atalay HA, Ateş E, Otunctemur A. Impact of holmium laser enucleation of prostate on erectile function: results of 12 months follow-up. 2017. doi:10.5336/urology.2017-58449
- Kim SH, Yang HK, Lee HE, Paick JS, Oh SJ. HoLEP does not affect the overall sexual function of BPH patients: a prospective study. Asian Journal of Andrology. 2014;16:873–7. doi:10.4103/1008-682X.132469
- Meng F, Gao B, Fu Q, et al. Change of sexual function in patients before and after Ho:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate. Journal of Andrology. 2007;28(2):259–61. doi:10.2164/jandrol.106.000372
- Ibis MA, Castiglione F, Khan N, Çakır ÖO, Tokatli Z, Yaman Ö. Erectile and ejaculatory outcomes after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a comprehensive narrative review. UroPrecision. 2025. doi:10.1002/uro2.70030
- Briganti A, Naspro R, Gallina A, et al. Impact on sexual function of holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: results of a prospective, two-centre, randomised trial. Journal of Urology. 2006;175(5):1817–21. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00983-3
- Gilling PJ, Wilson LC, King CJ, Westenberg AM, Frampton CM, Fraundorfer MR. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate: results at 7 years. BJU International. 2012;109. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10359.x
- Elmansy H, Baazeem A, Kotb A, et al. Holmium laser enucleation versus photoselective vaporization for prostatic adenoma greater than 60 ml. Journal of Urology. 2012;188(1):216–21. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.2576
- Chen F, Chen Y, Zou Y, Wang Y, Wu X, Chen M. Comparison of holmium laser enucleation and transurethral resection of prostate in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of International Medical Research. 2023;51. doi:10.1177/03000605231190763
- Daryanto B, Suryanullah WS, Putra PYP. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate: a meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials. Current Urology. 2024;19:6–16. doi:10.1097/CU9.0000000000000257
- Elshal AM, El-Assmy A, Mekkawy R, et al. Prospective controlled assessment of men's sexual function changes following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. International Urology and Nephrology. 2017;49:1741–9. doi:10.1007/s11255-017-1649-0
- Deslandes M, Klein C, Marquette T, et al. Influence of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate on erectile function: results of a multicentric analysis of 235 patients. World Journal of Urology. 2022;40:2747–54. doi:10.1007/s00345-022-04175-0
- Dalkin B, Dora CD, Baird B. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a narrative review of sexual side effects. Translational Andrology and Urology. 2026;15. doi:10.21037/tau-2025-735
- Gao Z, Wang P, Liu H, et al. Technological innovation of HoLEP: a multicenter, randomized, controlled study for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. World Journal of Urology. 2025;43(1). doi:10.1007/s00345-024-05438-8
- Jeong MS, Ha SB, Lee CJ, Cho MC, Kim SW, Paick JS. Serial changes in sexual function following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Korean Journal of Urology. 2012;53:104–8. doi:10.4111/kju.2012.53.2.104
- Capogrosso P, Fallara G, Boeri L, et al. Risk of orgasmic function decrease after HoLEP — results from a prospective trial (ExpHo). Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.08.170
- Capogrosso P, Ventimiglia E, Fallara G, et al. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate is associated with complications and sequelae even in the hands of an experienced surgeon following completion of the learning curve. European Urology Focus. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.euf.2023.03.018
- Placer J, Salvador C, Planas J, et al. Effects of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate on sexual function. Journal of Endourology. 2015;29:332–9. doi:10.1089/end.2014.0502
- Manfredi C, García-Gómez B, Arcaniolo D, et al. Impact of Surgery for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia on Sexual Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Erectile Function and Ejaculatory Function. European Urology Focus. 2022;8(6):1711–1732. doi:10.1016/j.euf.2022.06.007
- Badawy H, Almarakby A, Abdallah R. Comparative study of the effect of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus water vapour therapy on sexual function. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2026. doi:10.1093/jsxmed/qdag118.111
- Oh KT, Kim J. Aquablation versus HoLEP: propensity score matching analysis of functional outcomes and ejaculation preservation. Investigative and Clinical Urology. 2025;66:431–8. doi:10.4111/icu.20250055
- Gratzke C, Barber N, Speakman MJ, et al. Prostatic urethral lift vs transurethral resection of the prostate: 2-year results of the BPH6 prospective, multicentre, randomised study. BJU International. 2017;119. doi:10.1111/bju.13714
- Carletti F, Tamborino F, Turcan A, et al. Five-year retreatment and medication restart rates following benign prostate hyperplasia treatments: a nationwide real-world analysis. European Urology Focus. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.euf.2026.01.003
- Michaelis J, Träger M, Astheimer S, et al. Aquablation versus HoLEP in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a comparative prospective non-randomised study. World Journal of Urology. 2024;42. doi:10.1007/s00345-024-04997-0
Mr Musaab Yassin is a Consultant Urological Surgeon and Andrologist practising in Oxford and central London. FRCS (Urol). GMC 6118378. Reviewed August 2026.
This page gives general information and does not replace an individual assessment. Figures quoted come from published research and describe groups of patients rather than any one person — your own history, anatomy and priorities change what they mean for you.