Common Questions · Foreskin and urethra · No. 53
My stricture keeps coming back
Repeat stretching has a success rate most men would refuse if they were quoted it. There is now a middle option between endless dilatation and open reconstruction — and one honest gap in what we know about it.
By Mr Musaab Yassin, Consultant Urological Surgeon & Andrologist. Oxford and central London.
Men with a urethral stricture usually arrive having had it stretched. Sometimes twice, sometimes five times. Each time the flow improves for a while, then fades, and the appointment for the next one is made almost apologetically.
That cycle is not bad luck. It is what the numbers predict.
Why stretching keeps failing
A stricture is scar tissue in the wall of the urethra. Cutting it or stretching it opens the channel, but the injury of doing so heals the way scar always heals — by making more scar. Nothing about the procedure interrupts that.
The randomised evidence puts a figure on it. In the control arm of the ROBUST III trial, standard endoscopic management — dilatation or internal urethrotomy — achieved anatomical success in 27% at six months.12
That is the number worth having before you agree to a fourth dilatation.
What a drug-coated balloon does differently
The Optilume balloon combines the mechanical part of a dilatation with a local dose of paclitaxel, a drug that interferes with cell division and so suppresses the fibroblast activity that lays down the recurrent scar.345 It is the same principle used in coronary and peripheral arteries, applied to the urethra.
It received FDA approval for male urethral strictures in December 2021 and now appears in guidance for recurrent bulbar strictures under 3 cm.67
Does it work?
Yes, and unusually for this field the best evidence is randomised.
In ROBUST III, anatomical success at six months was 75% against 27% for standard endoscopic management,12 with 77.8% free of reintervention at two years8 and 71% at three years — essentially unchanged from the two-year figure, and roughly three times the control group's rate at one year.2
Around that trial sits a consistent body of real-world data:
- A meta-analysis of 7 studies and 457 patients: recurrence-free rate about 81%, complications 9.5%.9
- A Spanish multicentre series of 238 men: 73.8% success at a median eight months.10
- A single US institution: 90.7% free of reintervention at a mean nine months.11
- A UK institutional series with a median follow-up of 22.9 months: 82% free of reintervention, across mixed causes including radiation-induced strictures.12
- An Australian prospective cohort of high-risk strictures over 2 cm: 76% stricture-free at 30 months, with no complications.13
The longest data are from ROBUST I, which reported 58% functional success at five years — with peak flow improving from 5.0 to 19.9 mL/s and symptom scores from 25.2 to 7.2 — and an estimated 71.7% freedom from repeat intervention over the same period.3714 Those two figures measure different things: one asks whether flow and symptoms still meet a threshold, the other whether anything further had to be done. ROBUST I was also a single-arm study of 53 men with strictures no longer than 2 cm, so the five-year numbers carry less weight than the three-year randomised one.
What are the risks?
Mild and mostly transient: burning on passing urine, urinary infection, and blood in the urine for a short period.128
Two specific reassurances stand out. Erectile function was not significantly affected across the ROBUST trials as measured by the standard questionnaire.38 And in a dedicated study of 53 men with strictures at the sphincter level — the anatomy where any treatment risks continence — there was no new urinary incontinence, with 66% recurrence-free at last follow-up.15
Where it works less well
This is the part usually left out of the marketing.
Penile strictures. A small German series of 8 men reported symptom scores improving from 25.5 to 5.0 with no reintervention at 16.5 months.16 But in the penile subgroup of ROBUST III, freedom from reintervention fell from 75% at one year to 47% at two.16 The bulbar results do not transfer to the penile urethra, and anyone quoting you the headline figure for a penile stricture is quoting the wrong study.
After a previous urethroplasty. Two studies, both reasonable. A multicentre US series of 33 men found 80% early success against 88.9% in controls — no significant difference.5 A German multicentre series of 25 men reported 83% functional success at 12 months and 75.4% free of reintervention.17
If you are diabetic. In one multicentre European cohort, diabetes independently predicted recurrence with an odds ratio of 7.66.18 That is a large effect and a reason to have your glucose control looked at as part of the treatment rather than alongside it.
The gap nobody should paper over
There is no study comparing Optilume directly with urethroplasty.3
That matters because urethroplasty — open reconstruction of the narrowed segment — is the durable operation. It is bigger, it usually means a hospital stay, and its results in the right hands are long-lasting. A drug-coated balloon is an endoscopic day case with far less to recover from.
Choosing between them is therefore a decision made without the trial that would settle it. What is known is that the balloon substantially outperforms repeat stretching, and that it has not been tested against the operation it is most often used to avoid.
Most published patients have also had recurrent strictures with several previous procedures. Whether it works as a first-line treatment is being tested now, in a randomised trial enrolling 140 previously untreated men.19 One small series found no recurrence among 7 treatment-naïve patients — encouraging, and far too small to act on.4 A European registry is collecting real-world outcomes across broader practice.37
How strong is the evidence?
Strong for superiority over standard endoscopic management in recurrent bulbar strictures under 3 cm: a randomised controlled trial with three-year follow-up, supported by a meta-analysis and several independent real-world cohorts.129
Moderate for durability beyond three years, which rests on a single-arm study.14
Weak or absent for penile strictures, for first-line use, and for any comparison against urethroplasty.16193
Bottom line
If your stricture is in the bulbar urethra, under 3 cm, and has come back after dilatation or urethrotomy, a drug-coated balloon is a genuinely evidence-based alternative to being stretched again — and the randomised comparison is not close.
If it is in the penile urethra, or long, or you are being offered it instead of an operation you were previously advised to have, the picture is much less settled and you should be told that plainly.
The question I would want answered before agreeing to anything is not "does this work?" but "how long and where exactly is my stricture, and has anyone measured it?" A urethrogram and a flow test take an afternoon and they decide the whole conversation. Being stretched a fifth time because nobody has looked properly is the commonest avoidable thing I see in this condition.
And if you also leak after prostate surgery, tell whoever is planning your continence operation about the stricture — it changes the risks materially.
Worth reading alongside: the full appraisal of the evidence behind Optilume.
If this sounds like you
A first consultation is £295, and follow-up £190. It usually runs at least twenty minutes; allow up to an hour if you are likely to need a scan, a flow test, or blood or urine tests on the day. You do not need a referral to book privately, and you are under no obligation to proceed with anything.
Send an enquiry · Symptom questionnaire · Compare the treatments, with the evidence
The 19 studies behind this page▾
- Elliott SP, Coutinho K, Robertson KJ, et al. One-year results for the ROBUST III randomized controlled trial evaluating the Optilume drug-coated balloon for anterior urethral strictures. The Journal of Urology. 2021;207:866–75. doi:10.1097/ju.0000000000002346
- Srikanth P, DeLong J, Virasoro R, Elliott SP. A drug-coated balloon treatment for urethral stricture disease: three-year results from the ROBUST III study. Journal of Endourology. 2025;39:968–74. doi:10.1089/end.2024.0718
- Carmali D, Ramos S, Duarte S, et al. Optilume for urethral strictures: a comprehensive review. Cureus. 2025;17. doi:10.7759/cureus.82984
- Alnadhari I, Alshrani M, Alhattami A, et al. Drug-coated balloon (Optilume) for the management of bulbar urethral stricture: our experience. Urology Research and Practice. 2025;51:66–9. doi:10.5152/tud.2025.25020
- VanDyke ME, Joshi EG, Ceballos B, et al. Efficacy of the Optilume paclitaxel drug-coated balloon after urethroplasty: short-term results from a multicenter study. Therapeutic Advances in Urology. 2025;17. doi:10.1177/17562872241312522
- Kapriniotis K, Loufopoulos I, Apostolopoulou A, Anderson P, Papaefstathiou E. Drug-coated balloon treatment for urethral strictures: is this the future? A review of the current literature. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025;14. doi:10.3390/jcm14082854
- Gauhar V, Yuen SKK, Gadzhiev N, et al. Optilume, a minimally invasive solution for BPH and urethral stricture: what we know, what we need? An EAU endourology scoping review. BMC Urology. 2025;25. doi:10.1186/s12894-025-01896-3
- VanDyke ME, Morey AF, Coutinho K, et al. Optilume drug-coated balloon for anterior urethral stricture: 2-year results of the ROBUST III trial. BJUI Compass. 2023;5:366–73. doi:10.1002/bco2.312
- Estaphanous P, Khalifa AO, Makar Y. Efficacy and safety of Optilume drug-coated balloon for urethral stricture treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cureus. 2024;16. doi:10.7759/cureus.74069
- Cabezas Ruiz B, Campos-Juanatey F, Ibarluzea Martín P, et al. Efficacy and safety of Optilume paclitaxel-coated urethral dilatation balloon in real life: experience in a Spanish multicenter study. Actas Urológicas Españolas. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.acuroe.2024.10.003
- Mahenthiran AK, Burns R, Soyster ME, et al. A single-institution experience with the Optilume urethral drug-coated balloon for management of urethral stricture disease. Translational Andrology and Urology. 2024;13:1498–505. doi:10.21037/tau-24-104
- Karanjia R, Pineda-Turner A, Watts I, Whiting D, Chetwood A. Optilume balloon dilatation for urethral stricture disease: an institutional review of outcomes for multiple stricture aetiologies and characteristics. Cureus. 2025;17. doi:10.7759/cureus.91919
- Alhamdani Z, Ong S, Zhong W, Chin P. Optilume drug-coated balloon may lower the re-treatment rate postintervention for challenging urethral stricture disease in long-term follow-up: a prospective cohort study. Journal of Endourology. 2024;38:1192–200. doi:10.1089/end.2024.0318
- DeLong J, Virasoro R, Pichardo M, et al. Long-term outcomes of recurrent bulbar urethral stricture treatment with the Optilume drug-coated balloon: five-year results from the ROBUST I study. The Journal of Urology. 2025;213(1):90–8. doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000004229
- Jelisejevas L, Tulchiner G, Rehder P. Optilume drug-coated balloon dilation for male sphincteric (membranous) urethral strictures: 53 consecutive cases. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025;14. doi:10.3390/jcm14238369
- Salem J, Menendez-Suarez JJ, Tosev G, Borgmann H, Kuru T. Efficacy and mid-term outcomes of paclitaxel-coated balloon (Optilume) for penile strictures. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025;14. doi:10.3390/jcm14176022
- Tosev G, Geil-Bierschenk C, Damgov I, et al. Efficacy of the Optilume drug-coated balloon for recurrent urethral stricture after prior urethroplasty: a 12-month multicenter follow-up study. World Journal of Urology. 2026;44. doi:10.1007/s00345-026-06512-z
- Seiler L, De Giorgi GL, Mantica G, et al. Outcomes of patients undergoing Optilume drug-coated balloon for different locations of urethral strictures: results from a multicenter cohort. World Journal of Urology. 2026;44. doi:10.1007/s00345-026-06547-2
- Mahdi MB, Haase RN, Sander L, et al. Treatment of bulbar urethral strictures with Optilume drug-coated balloons in a previously untreated population (FIRST-CARE): protocol for a single-blind multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2026;16. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103948
Mr Musaab Yassin is a Consultant Urological Surgeon and Andrologist practising in Oxford and central London. FRCS (Urol). GMC 6118378. Reviewed August 2026.
This page gives general information and does not replace an individual assessment. Figures quoted come from published research and describe groups of patients rather than any one person — your own history, anatomy and priorities change what they mean for you.